Friday, 12 August 2016

Last Imo Rerun Polls in Review


LAST IMO RERUN POLLS IN REVIEW
     The last time I checked, the long awaited rerun polls in Imo State, which were targeted to produce respected individuals to represent Oru-East, Owerri-West and Isiala-Mbano State constituencies in the Imo House of Assembly as well as Imo-North Senatorial District in the National Assembly, successfully held on Saturday 23rd July 2016 as scheduled by the electoral umpire, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
     Though the conduct of the overall polls was free, fair and credible in spite of failure of some of the Smart Card Readers used during the exercise, likewise Oru-East State Constituency, the results for that of Imo-North Senatorial District alongside Isiala-Mbano State Constituency were declared inconclusive by the INEC Returning Officer, Prof Arinze Agbogu considering that the votes cast in (15) polling units in the entire area were cancelled; and statistics show that the affected booths have a total of about thirteen thousand (13,000) registered voters to its credit.
      Aside Oru-East State Constituency, for the two major contending political parties in Imo-North Senatorial District – the All Progressives Congress (APC) and the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), the results for the said inconclusive polls as regards the six existing LGAs in the district read thus, “Okogwe: APC - 9,355, PDP – 4,343; Onimo: APC – 3,630, PDP – 3,850; Ihitte Uboma: APC – 10,171, PDP – 5,184; Obowo: APC – 13,401, PDP – 6,641; Ehime Mbano: APC – 5,795, PDP – 13,048; Isiala Mbano: APC – 6,569, PDP – 7,076; totaling: APC – 48,921, PDP – 40,142”, thereby made the APC’s candidate, Chief Benjamin Uwajumogu to lead his PDP’s counterpart or his immediate rival – Chief Athan Achonu with 8,779 votes margin.
      However, it was gathered that only one electoral ward named ‘Osuachara’ in Isiala-Mbano LGA out of the total of sixty-four (64) existing wards in the senatorial district that was actually affected by the “cancellation”. Owing to this outcome, several wailers coupled with aggrieved members and supporters of the then leading party – the APC, lamented that the INEC didn’t get it right by declaring the election “inconclusive”. According to them, “just a ward” ought not to be a tangible reason for declaring an election that successfully took place in the other 63 wards in the district inconclusive.
      People really need to be properly orientated and guided on how this thing is being done constitutionally. In accordance with the Electoral Act, an election is said to be inconclusive when/if the total number of registered voters in the area where election couldn’t take place or was cancelled, as the case may be, supersedes the figure of the margin between the two leading contenders; it has nothing to do with the number of wards, booths or polling units that were affected, as being presumed. In this case, the total number of registered voters in the affected area was 13,000 whilst the figure of the margin between the two leading contenders was 8,779; this apparently signified that the said election truly deserved to be declared inconclusive since the former (13,000) is greater than the latter (8,779).
      It is done that way, because there’s tendency of the second candidate emerging victorious if the remaining or supplementary polls eventually took place as rescheduled by the electoral umpire. The arithmetic is obvious and understandable. As a result of lack of orientation or ignorance, people or the concerned electorate are usually fond of pointing accusing fingers at INEC whenever an election is declared inconclusive. In view of this assertion, there’s a compelling need for holistic awareness cum sensitization among the electorate to be organized by the INEC.
      I have no qualms as regards the reason for the inconclusiveness. My only question is: why was the voting in the polling units in question cancelled? I reliably learnt there was over-voting. If I’m to go by such information, I would ask; what resulted to the so-called over-voting? Even if there was “No voting/election” at the area, what actually prompted it? Does it imply that the security personnel posted to the area didn’t act as expected or were incapacitated? These are pertinent queries that must be attended to for posterity sake.
     To this end, the INEC ought to apply caution subsequently towards ensuring that no area or booth is sidelined while an election is occurring, not just in issues concerning Imo State but Nigeria at large. It’s no doubt disheartening that after all the time spent, the awaited election was still declared inconclusive. If such lapse had to do with logistics issue, the commission shouldn’t leave any stone unturned toward an effective and efficient preparation. In regard to security challenge, the relevant law enforcement agencies ought not to be reminded on how best to handle it.
      Another headache I had with the rerun polls was when I got informed that the INEC returning officer for the Oru-East State Constituency election reportedly claimed that he announced election results under ‘duress’. Probably some guns or weapons were pointed at him, or…? I sincerely couldn’t fathom where such ridiculous claim came from. I personally observed the election in question, and saw how successful everything went. How could an electoral official be placed under duress when there were several law enforcement agents around to protect his life or welfare? Such amusing claim was equally not unlike telling Nigerians that the security personnel posted to the area were lobbied to act otherwise contrary to their statutory functions.
      Notwithstanding, I deeply appreciate the INEC Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC) in the state, Mr. Nasir Ayilara for ensuring that the supplementary polls took place the following week, precisely on Thursday 28th July 2016, without further ado. Such step was indeed commendable because the uncertain fate of the affected areas or electorate was seriously telling on them. It’s worth noting that the final total results for the two major contending political parties in the Imo-North Senatorial District – the APC and the PDP, were 56,076 and 43,815 votes respectively, thereby making Chief Benjamin Uwajumogu of the APC to merge victorious with a margin of 12,261 votes. Chief Nkenna Nzeruo of the APC equally emerged as the winner in that of the Oru-East State Constituency alongside his APC counterpart in Isiala-Mbano, Chief Collins Chiji.
      I candidly appreciate all the bodies involved that made the election a success to include the INEC, the police and other security agencies, having done the needful during the polls. I specially commend the electorate for comporting themselves as long as the elections lasted. Unlike before, no iota of violence was recorded across the state and its environs; it’s indeed a way forward and a step in the right direction. We have proven to other states that we are now wise socio-politically, and that it’s no longer business as usual. I encourage us to keep it up and endeavour to maintain the tempo or do more in subsequent times.
      Meanwhile, as much as I plead with the aggrieved parties to trade with caution toward peace sustenance, I equally appeal to the apt quarters to swear in the victors of the concluded polls without hesitation. Undoubtedly, the concerned electorate had already suffered an untold hardship so far, thus further delay might warrant an unspeakable crisis. Think about it!

Comr Fred Doc Nwaozor
(TheMediaAmbassador)
-Researcher, Blogger, Public Affairs analyst & Civil Rights activist-
Executive Director, Centre for Counselling, Research
& Career Development - Owerri
_____________________________________
frednwaozor@gmail.com
+2348028608056
Twitter: @mediambassador            

No comments:

Featured post

UZODINMA AND BUHARI’S ‘WORKING VISIT’ TO IMO

by Fred Nwaozor The last time I checked, Imo was conspicuously at it again, hence needs to be re-examined by all-concerned for the good ...

MyBlog

Language Translation

ARCHIVE