Tuesday, 14 February 2017

Opinion I Okorocha, Obiano, and Their Fans


OKOROCHA, OBIANO, AND THEIR FANS
        
The last time I checked, the governors from Imo and Anambra states in the persons of Chief Rochas Okorocha and Chief Willie Obiano respectively, were observing what could best be described as ‘political cocktail’. A cocktail may be an alcoholic drink containing several recipes such as a Champagne cocktail, or something which is made by combining a number of different things such as a Shrimp cocktail.
         
The said cocktail was occasioned by a political talk made by Governor Okorocha during the get-together organized by the leadership of the South-East All Progressives Congress (APC) which took place in Owerri, the Imo State Capital – precisely at the Imo International Convention Centre (IICC) – few weeks ago. In that event, Gov. Okorocha categorically claimed or foresaw that three governors from the said zone would soon decamp to the ruling APC.
         
The governor went further to state that the APC’s leadership was going to use the forthcoming Anambra election to show that APC has arrived South-East. In an abrupt reaction to the claim, the Anambra governor, Chief Obiano having let out various tantrums concluded that Gov. Okorocha was ‘what a leader should not be’.
        
Thereafter, the Imo governor, in response to his counterpart’s reaction, challenged him through his Chief Press Secretary Sam Onwuemedo to publish his achievements in Anambra State while he (Okorocha) publishes his, so that, they would draw a holistic comparison right before the public. According to Gov. Okorocha, Chief Obiano had not actualized anything since he assumed duty as the governor of his state, thus did not deserve to call him names let alone ‘what a leader should not be’. He further disclosed that Chief Obiano could not withstand him when it calls for leadership prowess or accomplishments.
         
The pandemonium did not stop there. The Anambra governor continued, without much ado, from where his counterpart applied the brake. These altercations have undoubtedly generated a lot of ripples cum counter-reactions within the socio-political shores of the concerned zone (South-East) and beyond. Owing to this level of bitterness, many have paused to reason if these two governors were really in charge of sister states. One may wonder if there were personal grievances they had been nurturing prior to the emergence of the ongoing bickering.
        
It’s noteworthy that the misunderstanding, political though, had brought deep division among their respective fans. Their fans now walk round the streets cum major roads constituting social nuisance all in the name of protecting the interest of their role models. This set of fans and well-wishers had ceased to maintain decorum in their day-to-day exchange of bitterness in the public domain. Most of them, in most cases, resort to engaging in physical combat each time they presume that oral disagreement is not enough.
        
It’s pertinent to acknowledge that this critique is informed by the need to brief the ‘warring’ governors, and of course their various fans, on what they need to know as well as what is expected of them at such a time like this. Those of you whom have been following my writing style would strongly attest to the obvious fact that I don’t tender an analysis to eulogize anyone; rather, to appraise facts. In other words, I don’t write to please anybody or to satisfy his/her urge, but to speak the truth. I’ve attracted countless enemies as a result of such style of writing; on the contrary, I’ve equally gotten good and reliable friends and fans in view of that. Whatever the case might be, the point remains that I can never be deterred because I was called into this profession by the supremacy. Hence, my paramount interest is that of whom that sent me.
        
I want to begin by saying that Gov. Obiano made an overstatement. He was completely wrong by telling the general public that his counterpart was not what a leader ought to be. The statement or forecast released by Gov. Okorocha didn’t in any way call for such manner of outburst. The response wasn’t just childish but irrational. There were several other suitable ways he would have responded to the claim. After all, in politics, politicians are bound to employ sound tactics towards luring those in the opposition to their party. A politician who fails to properly market or advertise his/her goods is deeply in trouble. Read my lips.
        
Moreover, Gov. Okorocha didn’t mention the name of any particular governor in the speech. To this end, one may wonder why Gov. Obiano decided to take it personal whilst his counterparts from the other affected states – including Enugu, Abia and Ebonyi – chose to ignore the speech. Rather than reacting directly to the subject matter, Chief Obiano thought it wise to attack the personality of the speaker. That was indeed a discredit to his person.
         
However, I would have appreciated Gov. Okorocha if silence was used to reply his counterpart. I didn’t expect him to respond to such attack, which was conspicuously inconsequential. Every rational being noted the Chief Obiano’s attack as uncalled for and illogical, thus Gov. Okorocha would have considered ignoring it. In most cases, silence remains the apt and best way to address an issue, especially a very sensitive one of this kind. Sometimes, the way we react to an attack contributes in ridiculing our personality. The truth is, not every question deserves an answer, and so does an attack. Some questions, likewise attacks, are rhetorical.  
        
Even if it is not just a verbal attack but an assault, we ought to endeavour to know when to be silent and when to utter a word, since it is widely accepted that ‘two wrongs do not make a right’. As much as I appreciate Gov. Okorocha for his political uniqueness, I as well want to inform him that I was not pleased by the manner in which he handled the matter. It’s even mind-boggling when realized that the leaders in question are from neighbouring states.
         
Now, they are not the only ones involved in the lingering melodrama, but their teeming fans. My candid pity goes to those fans, because they do not comprehend the rudiments of politics; because they are yet to realize that in politics, people have to disagree to agree; because they don’t know that the two warring persons are not enemies but two staunch politicians who intended to attract the public towards their personalities; because they are not aware that the two leaders would soon reconcile in a dramatic – and perhaps interesting – way, thereby making them (the fans) seem not unlike mere morons.
         
Politics is a very funny, intriguing, but confusing profession that those who are into it are required to be very creative and inspiring toward ensuring that they remain relevant in the game. Against this backdrop, they are invariably ready to create any form of scene just to ensure that they are not found in a state of oblivion. Hence, it’s so pathetic that the onlookers or admires to this game and its players aren’t aware of the intrigue that accompanies it.
        
How can you be drinking Panadol for someone else’s headache? Stay away from their misunderstandings, for they know how to disagree as well as how and when to settle. Think about it!


Follow me: @mediambassador 
http://facebook.com/fred4nwaozor              
    

No comments:

Featured post

UZODINMA AND BUHARI’S ‘WORKING VISIT’ TO IMO

by Fred Nwaozor The last time I checked, Imo was conspicuously at it again, hence needs to be re-examined by all-concerned for the good ...

MyBlog

Language Translation

ARCHIVE